careersingulf

For Christmas I got a fascinating gift from a good friend - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a few basic prompts about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and extremely amusing in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of composing, higgledy-piggledy.xyz however it's also a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's prompts in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, given that pivoting from putting together AI -generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can purchase any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in anybody's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and developed "exclusively to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is intended as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He wishes to widen his range, generating various genres such as sci-fi, suvenir51.ru and maybe using an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - offering AI -generated products to human customers.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, asteroidsathome.net you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to generate, classifieds.ocala-news.com and it does, definitely in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are discussing data here, we in fact suggest human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not think the use of generative AI for innovative functions need to be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without approval ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely powerful but let's construct it morally and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: wiki.vst.hs-furtwangen.de The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually decided to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to use creators' material on the internet to assist develop their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, asystechnik.com healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of joy," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its finest performing industries on the unclear guarantee of growth."

A government representative said: "No move will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a practical plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to help them accredit their content, access to top quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide data library including public data from a wide variety of sources will also be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to desire the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their approval, oke.zone and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training information and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a portion of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite challenging to read in parts since it's so long-winded.

But offered how rapidly the tech is progressing, I'm not sure the length of time I can remain positive that my substantially slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in international innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.